- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Slum wine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
While this appears to be a real drink [1], it does not seem to be covered in any reliable sources; the only mentions of it that I can find are passing mentions on blogs [2] or listings on an occasional restaurant menu [3]. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 16:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 18:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism. Google books finds several references, but they're all either OCR errors (e.g. "shun wine") or different contexts (e.g. "slum wine-shop"). Pburka (talk) 23:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I hate to discourage new articles, but this drink is, at best, too new to be notable. Geoff T C 00:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a neologism, but full props to the author who used the references section to ask for some references: "For references, I need help. Please look it up yourself or order it at a restaurant. References just aren't available on the internet yet." Matt Deres (talk) 22:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.