Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sluts and Slobs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Conelrad (band). slakr^\ talk / 02:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sluts and Slobs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable EP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or alternatively Redirect to artist article Conelrad (band) per WP:AFDP#Music, nothing indicates the notability guideline for songs is met. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion discussions are only started when you try to redirect an article to a more appropriate page and get reverted. This clearly does not meet WP:NALBUMS. Also, a deletion discussion is inappropriate as this page (even if deemed not notable) would not be deleted, but redirected to the band's page. I would recommend that you redirect the article and see if any one reverts. This discussion is really not required. MaranoFan (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect - Fails WP:NALBUMS, plain and simple. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.