- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 16:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was prodded (by me) but the tag was removed. Copy and pasted from Lip Balm Anonymous ("Our primary purpose is to stay free from lip balm and to help others achieve the same freedom.") I could be wrong, but since that's not a specifically commercial site, I don't think it qualifies for a copyvio speedy. An article at slightly more correct title Lip Smackers containing similarly worded criticism of the brand was turned into a redirect to Lip gloss last month. Vary | Talk 17:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Crum375 19:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the nom. --Dakart 21:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Peta 06:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.