Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small business research
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Small business research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
What is this even about? It's somewhat unclear. I found it at new page patrolling, but I have my doubts about its encyclopedic notability or worthiness of inclusion. If it is indeed notable it'll require a complete rewrite and reliable third party sources. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 19:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like someone is using wikipedia as a notepad. VartanM (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definitely not even close to being an article. Jmlk17 00:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with VartanM. Kyriakos (talk) 00:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I originally did put a G11 tag on it, but User:Pedro declined it which is why I brought it here.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 06:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as spam. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.