- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No reason as to why it is notable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Smallpetitklein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacking third-party WP:RS since December 2008. Nothing indicating notability by WP:N. ~YellowFives 18:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as notable dance company, but article needs improvement.Talullah77 (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ORG and WP:RS. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.