Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartPixel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SmartPixel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous version of this article was deleted at AfD last year. I don't see any sourcing improvements that would indicate notability. Seems to be non notable software. Safiel (talk) 18:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. Fails notability test, previously deleted in an AfD and, per talk page, has COI issues. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 19:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt: no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, recreated after recent. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above and WP:CORPDEPTH. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article of unclear notability, created by a now-blocked user as likely promotional. The dottech.org review is not a reliable source, leaving only the softwarereviewboffin.com review, which on its own is not sufficient to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 23:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt: As per Nov 2013 AfD opinion and outcome, there is no evidence that this product is notable. AllyD (talk) 05:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Did not find any other suitable sources with which to establish notability. Two independent sources are cited in the article; neither are what I'd consider reliable sources: dottech.org seems more like a blog with a very small number of contributors, and Software Review Boffin publishes anonymous reviews, apparently soliciting reviews from the software publishers ("Is your Product featured on Boffin? Reviews are now being accepted (subject to Boffin's scrutiny)." Agyle (talk) 20:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.