Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Photo Editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Smart Photo Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:notability. Only sources provided are to a blog and a web forum. Google searches can only find similar mentions and directory entries - and very few of them. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 15:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This graphic software product is relatively new but does seem listed extensively on software download sites such as http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Graphic-Editors/Smart-Photo-Editor.shtml and http://download.cnet.com/Smart-Photo-Editor/3000-2192_4-75451073.html Its defining feature is the sharing nature of photo effects. No other photo software currently has this feature. Hoffdav (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being listed in a directory is not an indication of WP:notability. We need much more than that. noq (talk) 17:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken WP:notability. Any examples of what you consider notability would be really useful. Could we incubate the page until we get other improvement submissions from other people? Hoffdav (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable. No proof of notability. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.