Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Sources have been found. Deletion no longer an option. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Smint

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable breath mint, unsourced. CoolSkittle (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's quite a bit of coverage in this book from a reliable academic publisher. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added the book reference noted by Phil Bridger and made an inline cite of the one academic journal cited (for xylitol's effect on dental caries). I did a bit of clean up. Though the article can use more cleanup to tone down the promotional aspects further, the subject matter is sufficiently notable to pass WP:GNG. There are more references out there, but my first pass found them mostly in trade journals. I was a bit short on time to work on the article further. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has decent news coverage as well.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4] (May add some of these to the article later.) Gilded Snail (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as there appear to be enough sources available for notability, although I wouldn't class the Daily Star as a reliable source for anything other than football results. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttps://www.lavanguardia.com/se-lleva/20111028/54236553742/david-delfin-disena-para-smint.html

[2] ttps://www.thedrum.com/news/2013/12/16/mentos-mentos-gum-fruitella-and-smint-star-18m-london-based-outdoor-campaign

[3] ttps://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/470217/women-kiss-19-men-before-right-one-average-study-pub-nightclub

[4] ttps://www.nporadio1.nl/consument/3247-pepermuntjes-smint-helpen-niet-voor-schone-adem

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]