Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smogon Pokemon database

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising. See also: Smogon and Smogon internet database - FrancisTyers 02:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom (i know I don't have to but it makes me feel so good!) - FrancisTyers 02:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, even though the banner image is quite amusing. Hedley 02:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, yet another website... --dcabrilo 02:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nowhere near notable enough to warrant an article. Wikipedia is not a web directory, nor is it advertising space. - Mark 02:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete though I like the banner image. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not because of an arbitrary, POV 'notability' standard (I fully support WP:NPOV), but because this article is an advert not an encylopedia entry WP:NOT Cynical 14:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Smogon is great and all, but it has something like 100 (or less) users. That said, this has been deleted on AFD at least once and possibly more times than that, making it a WP:CSD for recreation candidate. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't appear that it has been deleted already according to its history. Stifle 13:13, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • It has been deleted under other names, not this one, and the site in question hasn't changed significantly since then. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.