Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snack: Learning Software For Nutrition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Snack: Learning Software For Nutrition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

completely and utterly non notable software, article created by the creator of said software and no sources demonstrating notability to be found. PRAXIDICAE💕 00:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. See also Draft:Potatosql: Learning Software For Database Design, with the same failings. —C.Fred (talk) 00:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, both are nothing but straight up advertisements for the product, created by the owner.but apparently this is what Wikipedia is for now, along with pointless AFDsPRAXIDICAE💕 00:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—This was a declined G11 Speedy deletion candidate where the editor declining believed this to be a salvagable article which needed independent sources to demonstrate notability. After a quick search set, I do not believe this to be a salvagable article at this time. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I declined the G11, with the intent of moving it to draft for sourcing, but the AfD was started before I finished editing. A quick Google search reveals multiple hits for products of this/similar names but not clear if they are this particular product. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Software. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:39, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Googling the phrase throws up a lot of hits, but I wasn't able to find anything independent and reliable that gives significant coverage to this particular software package. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a notable thing. Hyperbolick (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced article that admits it was a school project. W Nowicki (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.