- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure) There is a half-hearted but very real consensus that the article demonstrates sufficient notability to meet our standards. Darkspots (talk) 23:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This article was previously considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIN The Incompetent Ninja. Dlohcierekim 03:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snafu Comics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lack of reliable third party sources - I could not find any using Google News WhisperToMe (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fancruft for a webcomic that utterly fails WP:WEB. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Neutral per JJL's source. If more can be found, I'll switch to keep too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep surprised by how many reviews there are for e.g. "TIN The Incompetent Ninja" on Google. Enough hits to make me think it may be notable ([1]) so I lean toward keeping this detailed article. JJL (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The publisher's weekly article is a good find - If you find more reliable sources I can withdraw the nomination and instead focus on cleanup. Right now I don't think one source is sufficient, but if more are found then it is reliably documented. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Could use better sourcing and more real world significance, but is better sourced than the last AFD two years ago. Perhaps someone more familiar with web based sources can find something significant among the multitude of forums? Dlohcierekim 14:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep It does need better sources, but their is a lack of infomation on the web for it. Supergodzilla20|90 21:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.