• Home
  • Random
  • Nearby
  • Log in
  • Settings
Donate Now If Wikipedia is useful to you, please give today.
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SnapComms

  • Project page
  • Talk
  • Language
  • Watch
  • Edit
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, with a nice salty tang. The Bushranger One ping only 07:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SnapComms

edit
SnapComms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several times recreated. Non notable software company. Only claim to notability is finalist, not winner, for a minor award. References in previously speedied versions entirely from PR sources. DGG ( talk ) 23:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. GNews returns company web site and three press releases, clearly labeled as a such. GEverything returns a blizzard of links to company's website and its Twitter, Facebook, etc. homes; press releases; some directory listings. Nothing close to a RS source that I could see, but I confess I did not track down every last snowflake. The two external links in the article consist of a rather lengthy list of award winners by a local tourist/local business development board and coverage of same by a local paper. Neither mentions this company, so its claim to have been a runner-up in the competition, such as it was, cannot be verified. Not that I would have considered it meaningful or informative if they had swept every award in every category--I don't consider publicly-funded press releases more meaningful than privately-funded ones. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, and WP:NOTPROMOTION. As this article has been speedily deleted twice already for similar reasons, recommend delete and salt. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt: a software hosted solution. Jeezus. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SnapComms&oldid=1069482445"
Last edited on 2 February 2022, at 14:59

Languages

      This page is not available in other languages.

      Wikipedia
      • Wikimedia Foundation
      • Powered by MediaWiki
      • This page was last edited on 2 February 2022, at 14:59 (UTC).
      • Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.
      • Privacy policy
      • About Wikipedia
      • Disclaimers
      • Contact Wikipedia
      • Code of Conduct
      • Developers
      • Statistics
      • Cookie statement
      • Terms of Use
      • Desktop