- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Someone already merge it to List of Pokémon (201-220) --JForget 00:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pokecruft. No hope for exapansion; we don't need an article about every pokemon card. Not even worthy of merging. Reads like a fan site to boot TheBilly (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as stated no reason to have articles on individual cards. Ridernyc (talk) 05:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Adreamtonight (talk) 05:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There are thousands of Pokemon cards that have been released, nothing notabe about this one. TJ Spyke 06:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't look like a very notable set of cards in the TCG. This article will be better off in Bulbapedia.--Lenticel (talk) 07:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable Mbisanz (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. Doc Strange (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.