- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep with nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure Edgepedia (talk) 12:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sniggle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod for a non-notable protologism. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary; there is no place for this here. LadyofShalott 20:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- According to Talk:Sniggle there was a VfD discussion at one point in time.
I'll see if I can track down the proper link.LadyofShalott 20:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Well, it appears that is the link. The talk page is it. LadyofShalott 20:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- According to Talk:Sniggle there was a VfD discussion at one point in time.
DeleteKeep. Sniggling for eels is already at Wiktionary. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 20:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing to keep, as an article on eel-catching, per references added by Warden. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The work sniggle is used in EJ Poostay - The Reading Teacher, 1984 - JSTOR, [URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/20198630] Google Scholar gives:
Show me your underlines: A strategy to teach comprehension
EJ Poostay - The Reading Teacher, 1984 - JSTOR ... 123-26,163. Jabberboxy 'Twas August, and the impen swarms Did twitch and sniggle in the slats; All permy were the posimarms And full of intra-chats. ... And will he end up on the rocks, Or will he sup?rate?" Tis May now, and the impen swarms Still twitch and sniggle in the slats. ... Cited by 2 - Related articles - All 2 versions
However, it must be said that this article needs some work to ensure that sniggle is described in the way the above source (or other reliable references using the word sniggle) do.
Govynn (talk) 21:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The topic is notable and so should be kept in accordance with our editing policy. Warden (talk) 07:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability involves significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The article currently appears to lack such things. Do you have anything more? Sergeant Cribb (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The article now contains several such sources. Perhaps you need to refresh your browser cache. Warden (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for adding that. I don't see why you think my browser cache ought to have contained at 17:43 a reference you added at 18:22, though. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability involves significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The article currently appears to lack such things. Do you have anything more? Sergeant Cribb (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw the nomination. Well done, Colonel. LadyofShalott 19:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.