- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snippeting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be a protologism. Unreferenced, could not find reliable sources to convey notability. —LedgendGamer 20:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong delete, per the lack of clear context and the lack of references noted above. Even the website furnished in the article doesn't resolve. —C.Fred (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom + as the article appears to be advertising a website (albeit not yet up and running), speedy A7 / G11 apply. I42 (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears to be original research or advertising (although the website doesn't exist). Redirect to Snippet. snigbrook (talk) 21:21, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. WP:NEO and WP:OR. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR, no clear context, no notability. -t'shaelchat 01:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.