- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo limited 02:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
completely made-up term with no assertion of notability or sources to identify its use; also appears to violate WP:POV Fluit 02:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Jadriaen 02:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Navou talk 02:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Nick Y. 03:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - neologism --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Inherent POV violation, proto/neologism. (aeropagitica) (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only 27 Google hits Tyrenius 04:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. --BrownHairedGirl 07:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 13:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as NN neologism. Good word though. Robin Johnson 14:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, NN, POV and sounds like a bit of a joke article (in my opinion) DannyM 19:05, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.