- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snucka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism WP:NEO. The best possible source for establishing notability would be the Urban Dictionary [1]. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 16:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with extreme prejudice. WP:BOLLOCKS will do as a reason. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I see my nomination overwrote yours one minute after you nominated this. Maybe WP:TW needs some additional checks to detect when two people are creating an AfD at the same time. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 16:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NawlinWiki andy (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added the citation for the Urban Dictionary, which clearly establishes the link between this word and the Umphrey's McGee songs in question. A simple Google search confirms the connection as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenixroach (talk • contribs) 17:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source with which we can establish notability. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 17:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't you say in your first comment that Urban Dictionary would be the "best possible source" for establishing notability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenixroach (talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the confusion. I was being sarcastic in that the Urban Dictionary would be the best possible source for establishing notability, but since the Urban Dictionary isn't a reliable source (per WP:RS), then no notablity (Wikipedia notability WP:N) can be established for Snucka. I apologize for not being clear on that. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.