- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Notability looks marginal but there was no consensus to delete. TerriersFan (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SoccerProject (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable Chzz ► 03:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable online game. JIP | Talk 05:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no assertion of notability through reliable verifiable sources independent of the topic to satisfy WP:WEB. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 04:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Although it may not quite be notable, it is a good article with appropriate infobox and such. There are 11 inline refs, which is decent for an article of it's size. Mm40 (talk | contribs) 15:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Can someone just check out the policy of these foreign language news sites? These references might be from reliable, third-party publications, and therefore this article would be notable. But since I don't read dutch, I can't tell. Randomran (talk) 17:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - low traffic but seems to be cited well enough and the traffic exists. JaakobouChalk Talk 16:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.