Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social content

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Social media. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Social content

I can't find any evidence that this is used to mean what it means in this WP:OR filled, unreferenced article. Ironholds (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have since added external source to show where the term Social Content has been used extensively within the User Generated Content space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IncSlinger (talk • contribs) 18:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this just seems to be a very short OR essay with some links thrown in at the end. Even the title is so vague as to be useless for all intents and purposes. --WebHamster18:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the spam and redirect to User-generated content. It's an accepted term, but the content is unsuitable. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SilkTork *^YES! 23:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet notability guidelines and seems to violate OR, essay and dicdef policies. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to social media. This article is unsalvageably OR, but the name is a plausible search term - it should be redirected to one of our existing articles on this subject. Robofish (talk) 03:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.