- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Soft-edge Pop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominated on behalf of User:Bus stop (nomination partially completed). The issue here might be either tone or being a neologism, not sure. I am neutral. Raymie (t • c) 23:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator made this comment on the talk page: "This article has virtually no sources. I can find few references (online) to the topic of "Soft-edge Pop". The article communicates very little—I find the writing undecipherable. Deletion might be a good option."
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Raymie (t • c) 23:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Raymie. I goofed up the process of nominating the article for deletion. I guess I'm not perfect after all. I can find nothing of substance in the article Soft-edge Pop. It seems to me to be a joke. I'd be interested to see if anybody else finds value in it. Bus stop (talk) 23:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A little more research shows that the article's creation was the only work of User:Sciannik. It was pretty large for a new article right out of the gate, too. Raymie (t • c) 23:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although I did add imagery and some copyedit work back in January and there are a couple of references, the article seems to be WP:OR and basically stale...Modernist (talk) 02:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's sad to see this article go, it's a good read, but consists of mostly original research by the look of things. I attempted to find references to Soft-Edge Pop on various news sites and art journals, and then searched for the artists mentioned in the article and attempted to find any reputable sources classifying them as 'Soft-Edge Pop'. I came out empty. It simply doesn't exist in any mainstream media...is there any chance of this article being forwarded to an art journal or something? I don't know much about art, but this article may be worth a look-over by a profesional. Anyway, enough rambling, let WP:OR do the talking. 2birds1stone (talk) 10:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.