Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softqube Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 14:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Softqube Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. References are either directory entries (1,2), corporate website (2,4) or do not mention subject at all (4-8,10). I could not access ref # 9, but the title doesn't suggest that it provides deep coverage of Softqube. I tagged this for speedy but creator removed it, and then I decided that the sheer number of references, though irrelevant, would deter a speedy, so I am here. ubiquity (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Bazj (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and comment: Gartner Magic Quadrants are very reliable (they are the most trusted of the IT analyst firms) and they typically include a substantitve amount of detail. However, given that the firm only has 54 employees, no other quality sources are provided, and we have no way of verifying the source includes them (the mis-use of other sources suggests it cannot be trusted), I vote delete. CorporateM (Talk) 19:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.