Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software company
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. In its place, I'll leave a redirect to Software industry. — Scientizzle 16:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Software company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Seems like a useless list, especially since Category: Software companies already exists. Also per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_software_companies. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 04:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I would suggest a redirect to Software industry -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 05:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Keeping CCC in mind, I see no difference from the consensus already reached. - Rjd0060 05:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article consists only of a dictionary definition and a list. Good idea to redirect to Software industry. Phil Bridger 10:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 15:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Software industry seems sensible. the wub "?!" 15:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - i think this is a fairly notable concept. the article is terrible, but I think something could be made of it eventually. a redirect until then isn't a problem. Law/Disorder 20:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Question. But do you think Software company will ever merit a separate aricle from Software industry? Phil Bridger 20:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this, it seems pointless. 82.153.19.100 23:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per others. Radagast83 (talk) 03:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Phil Bridger :-) Stwalkerster talk 21:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.