Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software event horizon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Software event horizon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm having trouble finding any good secondary sources. Other deletion avenues have been met with objections but not sources. This subject does not appear to meet the notability requirements of considerable coverage in reliable sources. ErikHaugen (talk) 08:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Appears to be a confusing reference made by a non-notable person. Does not appear in common use (or even use outside of company names) anywhere Rotovia (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pure original research. Though it does seem that the software is taking over, sometimes. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC) [reply]
Delete. Based exclusively on a primary source, with no independent mentions to evidence notability of this proposed concept or term. Google searches using the links at the top of this AfD failed to find any. Pcap ping 19:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Pcap. LotLE×talk 23:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.