- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-26 07:21Z
Insufficiently sourced nn neologism Dl2000 03:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not even a dicdef, not even a believable neologism. It's just a typing exercise. Put it under a magnifying glass on a clear day. Shenme 04:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Okay...some sort of experiment? Sr13 (T|C) 07:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Aquatics Guard Alert 17:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not for something that drifted into your mind while you were bunking off school getting stoned. BTLizard 13:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete It is a common term used in many cultures. Someone will be curious and find the answers he/she seeks here. User:RyanW124 06:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.