Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldier Scalable Protection System
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Soldier Scalable Protection System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the general notability guideline. Marcus Qwertyus 19:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 03:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: as a commercial body armor, this fails notability. There might be notability for the Army project that BAE wants to enter this product into, but not the prototype entry... and in any case, it would probably be better to note this project at Improved Outer Tactical Vest until this project gets into the testing phase. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 17:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom, lacks "significant independent coverage" in reliable sources. Anotherclown (talk) 07:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.