Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solitaire Expert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Solitaire Expert

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article cites no sources and I can find no relevant book or internet sources. It is not listed either by Parlett in his gargantuan compendium of solitaire games nor by the more recent Morehead and Mott-Smith. Despite being tagged for no sources for 5 years, none have been forthcoming. Non-notable and unsourced; delete. Bermicourt (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ktrimi991 (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.