Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soltage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soltage

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Soltage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(PROD removed). I can't find a single non-primary source that isn't either explicitly a press release or plainly a regurgitated one. Fails WP:ORGCRIT/WP:GNG. ninety:one 16:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ninety:one 16:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. ninety:one 16:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Soft delete not available.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I found an article in the Chicago Tribune, but it just mentioned them. All the rest seem like press release regurgitation. FiddleheadLady (talk) 16:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Can't find any secondary WP:RS to establish notability. They might be one day, but right now it's at the very least WP:TOOSOON. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd settle for just one article about them that doesn't look like a re-worded press release. They clearly exist, and they're clearly doing things. Just one article where someone's actually regarded them as worth talking about in their own right... But until then, Delete. I suspect this article will be re-created in due course, but for now we don't have enough support for "notability". RomanSpa (talk) 14:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.