Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solus Software and Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Solus Software and Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have attempted to find reliable sources documenting notability for this company, but have only turned up copies of press releases about an "award" given by another firm and announced with a press release. I can't find any reliable source news reports of the award, or any other mention of this company. If some reliable sources exist to establish notability please add them to the article. If not, then this company may not yet be ready for a Wikipedia article, and should be deleted at this time. The original author of the article responded to a PROD by adding a few additional sources, which were all press release style and many made no mention of Solus at all. It appears that it may simply be too early to have an article about Solus until they establish themselves in a notable fashion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:COMPANY. Only coverage i have been able to find is the Frost & Sullivan award press release in a reuters article which has been reproduced elsewhere. I wasn't able to find independent coverage in Indian financial newspapers like The Economic Times, Business Line and Mint. --Sodabottle (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Company does not seem to be lare enoug to be notable, nor are their products innovative enough to deserve a WP article. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think its ok if the administrator deletes the same as even though they claim innovation, there has been no significant media coverage of the same. I'll reconsider an article on the same only if there is significant coverage in important financial media. Ashwin.sri (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, another non-notable tech business. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.