Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SomeImage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SomeImage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable image hosting service, fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:54, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Multiple searches found absolutely nothing to suggest this is notable and it's evident looking at the article. SwisterTwister talk 00:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable company. LaMona (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant RS coverage. Sources provided are blogs, incidental mentions, and a download site. A search turned up no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 02:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Here I was thinking that there was finally a recognition of my wine snob wizard class in WoW! No. Another idea for an imaging business online. Maybe it will grow one day, but it's not there now. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.