Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sommer Nectarhoff (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Essentially the same as last AFD. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sommer Nectarhoff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article on a young guy lacks reliable sources, even he is a writer and it has been PROD many times before also. Most of the references are self promotional. Fail WP:GNG A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 18:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete I restate my previous nomination for deletion: "Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NAUTHOR. The subject has written a lot of books but I am not seeing any RS reviews or commentary outside of bookstore sites, reddit etc." Since this has been recreated without better sources it should be WP:SALTED so we do not end up here a third time before this person gets some significant RS coverage. Jbh ^Talk 19:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Writerlier: There are now third-party, journalistic articles and radio shows. One show, the Writer 2.0 Podcast, is held by a professor of journalism at NYU. Another newspaper article is from the Tufts University Daily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writerlier (talk • contribs) 19:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the writing highlighted in the bio is all self-published. Blythwood (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note Based on the books listings at Amazon they seem to all be self published eg The Death of Ydain - Publisher:CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Self published works are, per WP:NBOOK inherently non-notable as are the writers there of, no matter how prolific they are nor how much they may want a Wikipedia article. Jbh ^Talk 03:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.