Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of Sam Horn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. BJ^Talk 06:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sons of Sam Horn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Lack of clear notability, sourcing. Does not appear to be particularly notable. rootology (C)(T) 13:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep as the slate article could do it. WikiScrubber (talk) 06:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 03:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep the standard is notability, not the greater one of being "particularly notable." Thus, no valid reason for deletion has been given.DGG (talk) 15:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient reliable third party sources to establish notability. -Nv8200p talk 13:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep looking at the coverage in Google news (particularly [1] and [2] ) its seems sufficiently notable for inclusion. - Icewedge (talk) 23:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.