- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 19:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sooda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are other things and people of the same name making it harder to search for, but even trying to filter those out I can't see RS coverage. It is only a one line stub anyway so we are not losing much content. If it gains more coverage later then somebody can make a new article then. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was likewise unable to find significant coverage of the software. JUJUTACULAR | (TALK) 22:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.