- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep as per consensus. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SoundTracker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently non-notable software. No independent third-party sources, despite the presence of a primarysources cleanup tag since February 2009. Psychonaut (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom, due to lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Changing to keep as well, I think this one can be closed. JBsupreme (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is [1]. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Changed to Keep: Per Pcap. Joe Chill (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per:
- Phillips, David (2001-01-01). "A Profile of SoundTracker". Linux Journal. Retrieved 2010-01-27.
- which cites:
- Phillips, Dave (2000). Linux music & sound : how to install, configure, and use Linux audio software. San Francisco: No Starch Press. ISBN 9781886411340.
- Keep per Karnesky. LotLE×talk 20:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meh. Also found tutorial in LinuxPlanet (part of internet.com sites). Not mentioned in more recent articles tough (these are from 2001-2002), and no mention in non-Linux contexts. It doesn't look that much music was produce with it though; mostly geekness factor. It's still part of Planet CCRMA, so maybe it has some relevance; dunno much about music production. Actually it's the only tracker software included there, so it's probably the most notable Linux one. Pcap ping 01:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep According to OS News, "Audacity [...] and SoundTracker, which are known to be for amateurs and far from professional tools". Emphasis added. This seems confirmed by a browsing of linux boards. Also, I've sound 3 different reviews from major publications, which I have added to the article as references [2]¨¨ victor falk 09:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; references have since been provided establishing notability. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.