Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet technology of Command & Conquer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Balloonman (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet technology of Command & Conquer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I tagged this for merging on 25 October, in case someone was interested, but this entire article is filled with in-universe or game guide information and there isn't really much worth saving. Delete or transwiki, if someone is willing. Pagrashtak 19:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pagrashtak 19:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Game cruft. Not a single reference, let alone a reliable secondary source to establish the encyclopedic notability of this topic. WP:N must be satisified by an WP:RS secondary source, this comes no where close. Transwiki it if you like, but this is essentially a fan essay, and just doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, be it paper or not. Pete.Hurd 19:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete same as the other one--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 19:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no out-of-universe context, unsuitable for a general encyclopedia. Interested editors may wish to transiwiki to this CnC wiki. Marasmusine 18:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - page has been tagged for less than a month, give it time for editors who locate the cleanup templates to address them. Relist in the future and if it's still garbage, then kill it then. MalikCarr 08:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - For reasons already stated --Eldarone 19:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per MalikCarr. IIRC there are several articles like this and most of them need merging and so forth. Mabye make a post about it at WP:Videogames or whatever it's called? Jtrainor 08:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• No one has given any reason why this article passes Wikipedia:Notability. Pagrashtak 19:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per my reasoning at the other one (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied technology of Command & Conquer). Miremare 19:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See response same response on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied technology of Command & Conquer --Eldarone 03:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - yet again a novel concept...delete in terms of policy: this article fails WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS...there's no references, and there's no demonstration from outside sources that this subject is actually notable in an encyclopedic way. We're not a game guide, folks! AKRadecki^Speaketh 03:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you forgot to mention the Official Website (http://www.ea.com/official/cc/redalert2/english/gameinfo.jsp), various game guides, IGN's own articles on the topic, etc. etc. --Eldarone 03:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Does not appear to have any notability. Judgesurreal777 23:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.