Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpaceInvasion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bigpoint_Games#List_of_games_developed_by_Bigpoint . (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceInvasion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage from reliable sources. The1337gamer (talk) 23:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) The1337gamer (talk) 23:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Anar chyte 00:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Bigpoint Games#List of games developed by Bigpoint, include a sentence or two. --Anar chyte 00:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This and this qualify as significant coverage. Clearly notable. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorofthewiki: Both of these sources appear to be completely unrelated to article and game in question. Maybe you should familiarise yourself with the topic first. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, those links are not about this game. – czar 15:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And in any case, a college student project page would not typically be sufficient sourcing to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Bigpoint_Games#List_of_games_developed_by_Bigpoint as the best choice when subject is non-notable and alternative to deletion; my searches found nothing particularly good with one at Books and and a few at News with browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary finding nothing as well. SwisterTwister talk 00:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to dev, as above. No meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Redirect to dev is cheap. I think the title is spelled with a space. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 15:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to dev, per above. Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in multiple RS sources, but developer is notable enough. Dialectric (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.