Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Tree (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - notability not established. Yomangani^talk 18:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable flash animation, fails WP:WEB. This was speedied through AfD just a few days ago, but for some inane reason it is somehow not speedy material now. --- RockMFR 18:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previous nomination (result was speedy delete): Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Tree

• Keep, but stub This article was only created yesterday. It has passed the db-web test and db-repost test (both removed by admin), and does meet WP:STUB. Diez2 18:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article should be speedy deleted, it still shows no notability. --Simonkoldyk 19:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If Bonus Stage doesn't have enough notability for Wikipedia, then Space Tree DEFINITELY doesn't. --FireV 00:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete again, no claim to notability. Sandstein 06:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Talk:Space Tree has raised the issue of the article being speedied before only because someone inserted tons of copyvio from somewhere. I think it might have some merit since the article had existed since February 2005 and no concerns were raised that whole time. This needs to be investigated further IMHO. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps an admin can look into prior versions and reveal any references that may be available? HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 19:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I restored the entire history so folks can look for a good revision in there. I'll admit I haven't looked through it all - I just though the whole situation looked a little odd. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I'll admit I may have jumped the gun with my deletions with regards to this before now, but I still think it should be deleted as being just another non-notable web cartoon. --humblefool® 21:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fair enough. Just wanted it to have a fair chance. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think this article should be kept, as a stub or full article, not sure. It has some note being a keentoon and having a large fan base. 18:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC) — Blkgor16 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete No references to notabilty, lots of time to provide them. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It IS a notable flash toon in itself, as it's sponsored by keentoons, of which there are only 5. and as of now, Space Tree is the only cartoon on Keentoons still adding new material, while the 4 other toons are either shut down or haven't updated in a long time. --Joe Somebody 01:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC) — Joe Somebody (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.