Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spain-Portugal comet fragment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. —Ganesha811 (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spain-Portugal comet fragment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was somewhat awkwardly removed by a pair of IPs - one removed my Prod2 while leaving the original prod, then another removed the original prod by Toadspike calling it a "duplicate". But it's still at least technically a contested prod, so here we are: this appears to be LLM-generated, and does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NASTRO. it was a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL event - a bolide. Bolides happen regularly. There is nothing outstanding about this event, and no lasting coverage. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable event, article probably written by LLM. Toadspike [Talk] 18:34, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. A very typical event that doesn't merit a page. Tepkunset (talk) 19:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are references that demonstrate notability from reliable sources. Anyway, are you going to also try to remove every other similar article? Or just this one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.103.137.19 (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- (1) Is there lasting coverage or just a spurt of "this happened" reports? (2) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Even ignoring the poor-quality LLM-generated content, this event is not a notable impact event. Ark Hyena (they/any) 01:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE per nom. The article is clearly LLM/AI-generated and I agree this is not a notable impact event - KyloRen2017 (talk) 02:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The existing sources appear to have a decent bit of speculation and not much actual information, it's not notable. Ardenau4 (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. Also, what are those "similar articles" mentioned above? Renerpho (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- aside from the way of writing, which can easily be improved, I do see handful of potential RS, but mostly lacks in depth coverage about the event, nevertheless will present some here, for others to consider.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/watch-a-blue-green-comet-illuminate-skies-over-spain-and-portugal-180984387/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-20/blue-green-comet-spain-portugal/103868608Lorraine Crane (talk) 20:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is likely a worldwide frequent occurrence, fails WP:GNG. To add insult to injury, also only has 3 sources, fails WP:SIGCOV. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 23:44, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.