- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sparx Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Administrative listing. Article was CSD-G11'd, but a related AfD resulted in a keep decision, so it didn't seem correct to me to CSD this. Hence, bringing it to AfD for a broader review. I personally am undecided which way it should go, but let the group mind decide. If the result is ultimately to delete, then Sparx Enterprise Architect (which is now a redirect back to here) should be deleted too. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Note that Sparx Enterprise Architect currently redirects here. This business is best known for Enterprise Architect, a popular UML and SysML modeling tool, which sounds like more IT department stuff of a kind unlikely to have long term historical notability or be sourceable among widely read sources. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and above, as well as the Sparx Enterprise Architect redirect. みんな空の下 (トーク) 20:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.