Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spasov submachine gun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spasov submachine gun

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Bulgarian firearm, no reliable sources could be found. Created by the most recent spate of User:Ctway socks. ansh 666 22:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 22:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 22:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 22:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. My first thought at seeing these AFDs was "almost all firearms are notable", however this does not seem to be the case here. Seems to be a copy of [1] (copyvio?). Sourcing is scant and doesn't seem reliable. Unable to find anything more reliable.Icewhiz (talk) 07:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost all firearms are indeed notable, but not their variants. The Trigun is the only notable weapon out the pack. And for the most part the whole notion of "RS" has to go out the window regarding soem of these older WW2 and early cold war firearms, very little in English is going to survive to be on the internet. Gun blogs, forums, and posts by either weapon historians or owners quickly become the new bar for RS in these types of articles. The Trigun is notable enough that sooner or later someone else can do a better job of writing an article about, probably not me :) L3X1 (distænt write) 01:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.