- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Spectral Power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be an obvious WP:NEO; author trying to gain attention for the term. — Timneu22 · talk 15:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:21, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a neologism. The Christian Science Monitor reference is original research since it is an opinion piece written by the gentlemen who coined the term, and therefore lacks independence. Cullen328 (talk) 01:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.