Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speech writing: CEO Preparation and Coaching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete —αlεx•mullεr 00:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speech writing: CEO Preparation and Coaching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Violation of WP:NOT, guidebook section. Also quite likely copyright infringement as the page looks like a pure copy paste. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Par being the nominator. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, obvious copyvio but nothing turns up in Google to id the source and speedy TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 19:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Dgf32 (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:Not a manual. If it is not a copyright violation, then it is almost certainly WP:Original research. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• CommentCopyright - how's that? Who are you people anyway? I cited the appropriate sources...how is this copyright violation? I wrote it. You all are very confusing - Down with Wikipedia!!! unsigned IP, transferred from Talk TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 21:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note above comment made by User talk:Kressjo on afd talk page & copied here by User:Travellingcari. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment from talk, unsigned: "It is a copy paste you morons. I wrote the paper then cut and paste it into wikipedia. How do you recommend I put it in here since i'm a not as computer literate as some of your tech savvy employees?" Hazillow (talk) 23:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NOT Bardcom (talk) 23:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, too guidebook-ish for an encyclopedia, also fails the "no original research" policy as well. RFerreira (talk) 00:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.