Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speed of light can be crossed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per snow. Killiondude (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speed of light can be crossed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Personal essay, bordering on WP:OR. role^player 10:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as hoax, nonscientific nonsense. --Pgallert (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unencyclopedic, unsourced, personal essay and pure OR.--Korruski (talk) 12:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as poorly written and factually inaccurate nonsense. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:27, 14 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete Unsourced personal essay. Edward321 (talk) 13:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Ray^Talk 15:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as garbage. Ray^Talk 15:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pure OR, pure rubbish. --Cameron Scott (talk) 20:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR—Chris!_c/t 23:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as original essay gibberish. How did this crap make it here? Carrite (talk) 23:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Woah, like, deep thoughts, dude. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:OR, and preferably delete at the speed of light or faster.  Chzz  ►  11:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Light speedy delete as hoax. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR! Heavens! Must have been asleep in classes on Relativity Theory. Sounds more like modern-day Zeno who hasn't heard of calculus. Jwilsonjwilson (talk) 06:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.