- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 23:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Spice Greene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable actor from non notable productions WuhWuzDat 23:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm seeking help to word in such a way that article is not considered advertisement or non nuetral. somebody help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G1 Publicity (talk • contribs) 23:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - shameless advertisement for non-notable figure by his publicist; no reliable sources, no meaningful hits on search engines, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Absolutely no evidence of notability; COI-ridden spam-fest. ukexpat (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete May be a professional, may be an established one, but by no means notable. Greenleaf (talk) 18:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not the place to post your resume. Edward321 (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.