Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spikor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not sourced, no 3rd party coverage, no notability Black Kite 01:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spikor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor character without any reliable third person sources or notability it should be merged to List of Masters of the Universe characters or deleted

Dwanyewest (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Consists entirely of original research. Pcap ping 05:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable characater, lacks real-world notability and coverage from reliable third party sources. JBsupreme (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
merge adequately the information is verifiable, being based as it should be on the fiction itself. DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this particular character is notable to people in the real world with even a cover titular appearance of a publication in addition to being on the show and as a toy. As nominator offers a merge ___location above, at worst we would follow WP:BEFORE and WP:PRESERVE and do that instead of redlinking. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 00:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He appeared as a toy in the original series and in the relaunch, in three episodes of the cartoon, including as a main character in one, and in the comic books. Interesting article to read(yes, I know, some people don't consider that a reason to keep something, since they want to delete all interesting content from Wikipedia and have just a small number of bland short and meaningless articles instead). Dream Focus 07:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- No evidence of notability. Since it is required that articles be backed up by reliable secondary sources, and this hasn't got any sources of any kind, we should not have an article on it. It's also mostly original research. Reyk _YO! 10:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the nominee non notable character 84.9.159.20 (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<del> — per nom as unsourced, non-notable. it's wp:plot and wp:or. Jack Merridew 17:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or possibly merge into list of article. Much of the Character history is not in-universe. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable villain in notable franchise. I have added a source. Colonel Warden (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.