- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD #G11 or any of the other criteria discussed in this AfD. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Spiraldesign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Violates WP:DICTIONARY + WP:NEOLOGISM + the cited citation does not even support the given definition. Abecedare (talk) 06:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. I tagged this db-a1, and stand by the view that the article conveys no idea of what it's talking about. To the extent one can tell, it's almost surely blatant advertising for Spiraldesign.net, the cited source, which is a non-notable website for a non-notable company. For what it's worth, I only picked a1 instead of g11 because it leaves a more polite Twinkle notification. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - as spam. The only reference is to a company with the name Spiraldesign. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 07:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, {{db-web}}, besides blatant advertising for Spiraldesign.net. Anna Lincoln 08:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Pure spam for Spiraldesign.net. Warrah (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.