- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable neologism, Hit bull, win steak's prod disputed by Skell6. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A neologism, however
onomatopoeiconmontoapoiconamatopaeiouoicnice sounding, remains a neologism. Vizjim 12:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Delete - unverifiable ramblings Mrjeff 12:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neovocabcruft.--Fuhghettaboutit 13:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. DarthVader 13:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only 799 Google hits would not yet be good to keep it.--Jusjih 14:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax, neologism. TheMadBaron 14:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. Paddles 14:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all non-notable protologisms, including this one. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all. Aplomado talk 17:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.