- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-encylopedic. We really don't need to explain every Monty Python episode in history with individual articles, no matter how hilarious. Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. Natalinasmpf 04:34, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Monty Python. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Interesting explanation of word usage. -- JJay 05:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not worthy of its own article.
Redirectsomewhere, but not Monty Python, something more specific than that. Someone should be able to think of something. -R. fiend 05:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]- splurge, sponge, Nancy Spungen, vole, lackey- lots of good possibilities. -- JJay 05:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- After a little more investigation, it appears there is no good place to redirect this to. There is no article for the Python skit itself (for the best, really), nor is there a words and phrases from Monty Python article (or the like). Just delete it. -R. fiend 05:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- splurge, sponge, Nancy Spungen, vole, lackey- lots of good possibilities. -- JJay 05:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not worthy of a redirect. A coined word in one of Monty Python's less notable bits doesn't mention a mention even in Monty Python's Flying Circus. Even redirecting would be inviting trouble with the coinage in various television programs. B.Wind 05:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Belongs in dictionary, not encyclopedia.Madman 06:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Belongs in bit bucket, not dictionary or encyclopedia. Python-cruft. --Calton | Talk 07:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.