Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sponge Bob errors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. SNOW. A7, OR, trivia, name it. Tone 18:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sponge Bob errors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-verifiable list of fan cruft. PROD denied by author. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete - per nom. Nothing worth salvaging. Favonian (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable list. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 15:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable, OR, and the spelling looks far too bad to be simply bad spelling, this looks more like a nuisance entry. Hairhorn (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Even ignoring the spelling (and for a member of WP:TYPO it is indeed painful), this seems not notable at all. Maybe in the "Goofs" section of IMDB it would be more welcome. McMarcoP (talk) 15:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete trivia cruft. And that's not even going into the original research and the erm..."nodisabol" spelling errors. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.