- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Spoudware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary and is not for neologisms made up one day. Contested PROD. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as ridiculous neologism per WP:CSD. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 16:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I wish there was a CSD that covered this sort of thing; G3 is probably nearest, but it doesn't really fit. I did once propose a speedy for things blatantly made up one day in school, but it got little support, so I fear we're stuck with the PROD -> AfD route. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no speedy criterion applies. Powers T 18:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I guess that depends how you read it. The CSD criteria state that neologisms except for the ridiculous ones are not sufficient for speedy nominations. I read that as saying that ridiculous neologisms do qualify as speedy criterion, but you're right, there's no obvious way to handle it except db based on vandalism, which this may not be if we assume good faith. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 18:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nonsense protologism. (Technically, this is kind of touchy when it comes to speedy criteria - I'd love to see one rewritten to allow for deletion of protologisms, but I've been told that wasn't a good idea before.) Tony Fox (arf!) 21:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete protologism. JuJube (talk) 05:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete by WP:SNOW as nonsense - a protologism is a word to be made up some day. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.