Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpringPeople Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SpringPeople Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Borders on promotion. No independent references given. Google search turns up almost nothing other than the company's own sites, this article, and directory-style listings. (Contested speedy.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, advertising laden with decorative upper-case: the master Certified Training Delivery Partner for SourceSource Inc., in India. As certified training delivery partner, SpringPeople Technologies runs public and onsite training courses for all the SpringSource courses - like Core Spring, Enterprise Integration with Spring etc. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Issues with both G7 & G11 - no independent, significant coverage. Skier Dude (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above. Haakon (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.